When it comes to selecting ETFs, there are three important factors to consider, and a fourth that is just as important, but often ignored.<\/p>\n
First, a definition. ETFs are exchange-traded funds. Like stocks and unlike mutual funds, they trade throughout the day. They are also set up to mirror the performance of an underlying investment. Some ETFs mirror an index, like the S&P 500\u00ae. Over the years, investment companies have produced more complex ETFs, such as those that mirror the performance of a country, sector or commodity, or those that are actively managed.<\/p>\n
ETFs are finding an increasingly prominent place in well-informed investors\u2019 portfolios, especially those of slightly wealthier investors who are more apt to be aware of the tolls fees take on investments \u2013 and are therefore seeking an alternative to mutual funds.<\/p>\n
If you\u2019ve decided that you want to add a particular kind of asset to your portfolio, and you\u2019ve made the decision that an ETF is the right way to do so, you\u2019re at the point where it\u2019s time to look in detail at one or a handful of ETFs. If you\u2019re working with a financial advisor, you can use this list to ask him or her in detail about the characteristics of ETFs in your portfolio.<\/p>\n
Liquidity is a baseline consideration. Here\u2019s why.<\/p>\n
As the number of ETFs has exploded \u2013 there was one in 1993; the number surpassed 1,000 in 2011 \u2013 a growing number of companies have jumped into the market, offering fairly specialized ETFs with a limited number of shares. The limited number of shares translates into limited liquidity.<\/p>\n
Why does liquidity matter? If you go to sell your low-liquidity ETF, you may not find a buyer. In fact, liquidity was one of the concerns of a recent advisory put out by the North American Securities Administrators Association.<\/p>\n
Liquidity also affects what\u2019s called the bid\/ask spread. A low bid\/ask spread means that you are more apt to be able to buy an ETF for the amount that you want to pay. An ETF trading frequently may have a low bid\/ask spread. For instance, SPY with over 200 million shares a day has a bid\/ask spread of one penny: 133.76 bid, 133.77 ask. One that trades less frequently may have a higher one:\u00a0 BBH, which averages 18k shares traded per day has a bid ask of 14 cents based on the current quote bid: 107.59 bid, 107.73 ask.<\/p>\n
There is no absolute rule, but Wealthfront founder Dan Carroll says he sticks to ETFs with at least 100,000 shares traded in daily volume. Here\u2019s where you can see the number of shares trading for ETFs: http:\/\/news.morningstar.com\/etf\/Lists\/ETFReturns.html<\/a>.<\/p>\n You can search for bid\/ask spreads on an ETF simply by going to Yahoo!\u2019s finance section<\/a> and typing in the name of one.<\/p>\n Common ETFs \u2013 those that mirror indexes like the S&P 500 \u2013 tend to have very low management fees, often well under .5%. (Generally speaking, it\u2019s safe to say that a common ETF will have a lower management fee than a similar mutual fund.)<\/p>\n Vanguard ETFs often have the lowest expense ratios.<\/p>\n As you might expect, more complex ETFs, such as those intended to capture the performance of a sector, like biotechnology, or a country, like Japan, have higher fees. Expense ratios for those ETFs fall into a wider range, and can be as high as 1%. Actively managed ETFs may have even higher expense ratios.<\/p>\n One good resource to find the expense ratios for ETFs: http:\/\/screen.morningstar.com\/etfselector\/etf_screener_version1.aspx<\/p>\n The spam that Morningstar sends is a small price to pay for access to this list.<\/p>\n A growing number of brokerages, including Schwab, TD Ameritrade and Fidelity, have begun offering commission-free ETFs. (Fidelity offers some iShares’ ETFs commission-free; TD Ameritrade offers a variety of providers’ ETFs commission-free, and Schwab is offering its own ETFs commission-free.) However, don\u2019t forget that in the financial services industry, a fee that disappears from one place usually crops up in another \u2013 what we like to call the \u201cwhack-a-mole\u201d phenomenon. If you are buying a commission-free ETF, check to see if the management fee is higher than other ETFs that are sold with a commission.<\/p>\n One critical mistake you might make, in fact, is to buy a commission-free ETF without stopping to consider whether you actually plan to trade it. If you are planning to hold the ETF, a low expense ratio is much more to your benefit than no commissions.<\/p>\n If you plan to actively trade your ETF, you need to factor in the amount that your brokerage will charge to make trades. That could be as little as $7 or $8 at online discount brokerages, or much more.<\/p>\n To tell if an ETF is commission free, you have to search for the lists that Schwab, Fidelity and TD have stating which ETFs qualify.<\/p>\n As you know, an ETF is set up to mirror an underlying investment. But exchange traded funds are almost never able to exactly<\/em> mirror that underlying asset class. For instance, instead of buying \u00a0the shares of every company in an index, the ETF may buy a representative sampling.<\/p>\n The difference between the performance of the underlying asset class and the ETF is what\u2019s known as the tracking error. It can be quite large, especially with more complex ETFs. You have to look deep to find tracking error data \u2013 which is why we think of it as the black box of ETF data. When the tracking cost is negative, it acts as an embedded cost.<\/p>\n Consider it this way: if you\u2019ve decided that you want your portfolio to include emerging market assets, because you\u2019ve decided that emerging markets hold promise for growth, the tracking error of the ETF you pick may instantly lop 1-2% off the performance.<\/p>\n Tracking error is lower for common ETFs, but still a factor to consider.<\/p>\n Here are two places where you can find tracking-error data (thanks to ETF Trends for helping us with these sources):<\/p>\n Here is a sampling of the post<\/p>\n For the sake of this example, let\u2019s also assume that you are 35 years old, have $100k to invest and plan on diversifying across all asset classes.<\/p>\n U.S. STOCKS<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n Vanguard Total Stock Market (VTI)<\/strong><\/p>\n iShares Russell 3000 Index (IWV)<\/strong><\/p>\nExpense ratio<\/h2>\n
Commissions<\/h2>\n
\n
Tracking error<\/h2>\n
\n
\n